Header1200x385

facebook_page_plugin
× Welcome to the CPL Meteorology question and answer forum. Please feel free to post your questions but more importantly also suggest answers for your forum colleagues. Bob himself or one of the other tutors will get to your question as soon as we can.

Take off charts and windsock showing a different direction to the runway

  • Posts: 57
  • Thank you received: 0

Flightsurgeon created the topic: Take off charts and windsock showing a different direction to the runway

In calculating the take off distance required, if the windsock shows a direction different to the runway, do I first calculate the headwind component of that wind and use this

eg suggest taking off from runway 09 and the wind is from 120M ( 30 degrees to the runway ) and the wind is 20 KTS, then the crosswind would be 10 KTS and the headwind would be 17 KTS ( approx). Therefore should I use 17KTS as the headwind in the calculations

Kind regards

Ravi
#1

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • John.Heddles
  • Offline
  • ATPL/consulting aero engineer
  • Posts: 843
  • Thank you received: 101

John.Heddles replied the topic: Take off charts and windsock showing a different direction to the runway

do I first calculate the headwind component of that wind and use this

yes

taking off from runway 09 and the wind is from 120M (30 degrees to the runway) and the wind is 20 KTS, then the crosswind would be 10 KTS and the headwind would be 17 KTS (approx). Therefore should I use 17KTS as the headwind in the calculations

Minor caveat to keep in mind. While the runway number generally indicates the magnetic direction rounded off to the nearer 10 degrees, this may not always be the case, for example, if the number is modified to avoid confusion with multiple runways. It is preferable to check the runway magnetic direction (eg AIP) and work from that figure rather than the rounded runway number. Generally, not a significant difference, but it is an easy consideration to address.

A couple of other considerations.

With a crosswind, there will be an increase in drag although this, generally, will not create a significant difference in the distance requirement.

However, a much more important consideration, if you are flying multi-engined aircraft, relates to Vmcg, if you are operating in that low-speed range for the takeoff. The real world Vmcg (as opposed to the certification figure) changes markedly in a strong crosswind. If the failure is on the upwind engine, the real world Vmcg will increase and, if on the downwind engine, decrease. This may invalidate the speed figures for a minimum speed, or near minimum speed, takeoff even to the extent that the aircraft may depart the side of the runway unless the takeoff is rejected. Certainly, worth keeping in mind for those folks who end up on heavy aircraft.

Engineering specialist in aircraft performance and weight control.
#2

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 57
  • Thank you received: 0

Flightsurgeon replied the topic: Take off charts and windsock showing a different direction to the runway

Thank you so much , it was very informative
THis is for the RPL exam and so a fair while away from multi engines

but thank you so much it has been extremely informative
Kind regards

Ravi
#3

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • John.Heddles
  • Offline
  • ATPL/consulting aero engineer
  • Posts: 843
  • Thank you received: 101

John.Heddles replied the topic: Take off charts and windsock showing a different direction to the runway

This is for the RPL exam and so a fair while away from multi engines

Indeed, but I expect to see you in twins in time to come and, if you follow a pattern I have observed in the past with some of your colleagues, possibly light jets. More importantly, those reading these threads will include a wide range of progress in flying study and application. We have an intention to make sure that our posts are appropriate for any member of the reasonably expected readership.

Engineering specialist in aircraft performance and weight control.
#4

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.079 seconds