Header1200x385

facebook_page_plugin
× Welcome to the IREX question and answer forum. Please feel free to post your questions but more importantly also suggest answers for your forum colleagues. Bob himself or one of the other tutors will get to your question as soon as we can.

Instrument serviceablilty: IFR CHTR vs IFR PVT

  • Posts: 90
  • Thank you received: 2

rubber created the topic: Instrument serviceablilty: IFR CHTR vs IFR PVT

Dear Bob,

On page 2.4 of the Instrument Rating Study Guide, you make a point about the difference between instrument serviceability requirements in IFR charter and IFR private flights. I will summarise:

IFR charter - all instruments must work even if they are not required for the flight. However if an instrument that isn't required doesn't work, and it's on the list of permitted unserviceabilities, you can either placard it or you can remove it.

IFR private - only the instruments you need for the flight must work. However if one of the unnecessary instruments is faulty, it must be removed, unless it's on the list of permitted unserviceabilities. In which case you can placard it.

So what's the difference? It seems to me that in both cases, if a faulty instrument is on the list, it can be placarded.

Secondly, what if an unnecessary instrument in an IFR charter flight is unserviceable and isn't on the permissible list?

cheers,
rubber
#1

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 90
  • Thank you received: 2

rubber replied the topic: Instrument serviceablilty: IFR CHTR vs IFR PVT

Anyone have any comments on this? What's the essential difference between the serviceability of instruments on IFR charter and IFR private flights?
#2

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Richard

Richard replied the topic: Instrument serviceablilty: IFR CHTR vs IFR PVT

Hi Rubber,

Let's have a closer look at CAO 20.18 Section 10:

10.1 says if it is IFR RPT or Charter, everything fitted needs to be working. If it isn't you must not fly with it in the aircraft unless it is in the MEL (which is required for RPT ops anyway) or the equipment is a passenger convenience item and is not going to affect the airworthiness of the aircraft. If you do have that item as a permitted unserviceability on a MEL, you may placard it instead of removing it completely which saves you grounding an aircraft and removing equipment or instruments because some non-essential item has become unserviceable. (CAR 207 mentioned in 10.1 basically says you shall not operate an aircraft without fitting the instruments and equipment which CASA specifies for that class of operation).

10.1A says if it is a private or aerial work flight all required instruments and required equipment must be serviceable but makes no mention of the instruments and equipment which are not required. The non-essential instruments do not have to be removed if they are unserviceble but if required equipment is unserviceable, you are grounded.

10.2 then goes on to say if you are going to fly with something unserviceable you need to placard it or remove it. That means for RPT aircraft, the item must be in the MEL and for private/aerial work the item must be a non-required item.

So, in a nutshell:

RPT and Charter aircraft are grounded unless the unserviceable item is in the MEL and the item is placarded or removed. Alternatively the item can be unserviceable if it is a passenger convenience item and doesn't affect airworthiness. (CAO 20.18 10.1). Private and Aerial Work aircraft are only grounded if the unserviceable item is a required item. (CAO 20.18 10.1A). However, if any aircraft is going to then fly with something unserviceable, it must be placarded or removed from the aircraft (CAO 20.18 10.2).

My 2c worth ;)

Cheers,

Rich
#3

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.073 seconds